Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Saturday, November 03, 2007
...Ad Deum Qui Laetificat Iueventutem Meum !

Many thanks to the good priests of the Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priest. Thanks to their patience and hospitality, I offered Mass in the extraordinary form for the first time last Monday. I also thank my readers (both of you) for your prayers on this occasion! A seminary classmate was in attendance (the first time he had ever attended the extraordinary form of the Mass) and he was duly edified. To offer Mass in the extraordinary form is a very prayerful experience in a way that is different from that of the ordinary form. I am not quite sure how to articulate it, because it is the not the sort of thing that can be spoken of, but must be experienced (this applies regardless of which side of the altar rail one is on). It is my thought that many people will be moved to take advantage of Summorum Pontificum, as they come to experience it. They will share their joy with others and it will catch on, slowly, but sure enough, many more people will come to experience this form of the Mass! My classmate, whom I shall not name, has now expressed an interest in offering the Mass in the extraordinary form, that he may offer it for his parishioners as well.
Saturday, October 20, 2007
Introibo ad Altare Dei

Saturday, October 13, 2007
All Soul's Day - Sung Requiem Mass - Extraordinary Form

Thursday, July 19, 2007
Bishop Finn on Summorum Pontificum

Tuesday, July 17, 2007
NCR Editorial on Summorum Pontificum

Mother church earnestly desires that all the faithful be led to that full,
conscious and active participation in liturgical celebrations called for by
the very nature of the liturgy. ... This full and active participation by
all the people is the aim to be considered before all else. For it is the
primary and indispensable source from which the faithful are to derive the
true Christian spirit
Fine, this is reasonable. Except that their definition of "Full
Concsious and Active participation" means that everyone has to have a job, a
task to complete in order to be fully, consciously and actively
participating. Here I am reminded of a talk given some time ago by
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger regarding these very words, and, in fact, the
whole of the text of Sacrosanctum Concilium and how they can be applied as referring to (what we now call) the extraordinary form of the Roman Rite - for that is the liturgy the Council Fathers had in mind when they drafted that document - as well as to (what we now call) the ordinary form of the Rite.Our Friends at the NCR go on to catalogue some of their other fears regarding the ways in which the Motu Proprio will be disruptive to the life of the Church:
We fear that re-embracing the Latin Mass could undermine the liturgical reforms that undergird the spiritual and theological developments of the Second Vatican Council. Changes that will set off our alarms include:
Let me point out that offering the option for the Latin Mass (according to the extraordinary form) is a truly liberal position - giving people more options than they had before! Nevertheless, as the Holy Father said in his letter, the wider exposure and availability of the extraordinary form will also help us to correct some of the de-formations of the liturgy that have taken place over the past forty years. I hope the NCR is NOT equating de-formations with true "liturgical reforms"
Reconfiguring seminary curricula to focus time, resources and talent on training priests to offer Mass and other sacraments in Latin and away from training that would support celebrating the sacraments in the vernacular.All of a sudden they are concerned about seminary formation.
Cutting back on seminary training on pastoral duties, such as counseling and chaplaincies.Offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass IS the primary pastoral duty of a priest (followed closely by the proper and fruitful administration of the Sacrament of Confession. Unfortunately, in my time in the seminary, only two classes (count six credit hours) were offered for those two pastoral duties. The priests trained at Our Lady of Guadalupe spend an entire year doing offering what are called "dry Masses" (no minister, no intention) in preparation to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. As far as counceling and chaplaincies, I think the seminaries SHOULD spend more time on liturgy and Sacraments and less time (though sufficient) on authentic training for authentic counseling and authentic chaplaincies - which involve administering the Sacraments. This notion (that Sacraments and liturgy are really unimportant) is indicative of the deconstructionist mode of so many of those who actually subscribe to the NCR.
Restricting church design and architecture in favor of old forms not conducive to the guidelines in liturgical documents written in the last 20 years.
Many of the "liturgical documents" of the past twenty years (esp. those with regard to church design and architecture) are not binding in any sense. Much of the renovations that were done by the gospel according to Vosko were not at all envisioned by Sacrosanctum Concilium.
Discouraging efforts to use contemporary music and other artistic expressions in liturgy.
Yes! The rite has its own music (primarily Gregorian, and secondarily those expressions which are based on Gregorian melodies). As far as artistic expressions, when (modern) culture is NOT formed by a Christian ethos, those (modern) cultural expressions do not have a beneficial role in the Worship of God.
Increasing restrictions on liturgical ministries open to all laypeople, men and women.
Mmhh! Because Full, conscious and active participation does not mean that everyone must be physically "doing something" within the sanctuary!
I think the above "concerns" clearly illustrate our Holy Father's desire as far as the extraordinary form enriching and influencing the celebration according to the ordinary form. Perhaps the folks at the NCR have read the Motu Proprio pretty clearly!
I am reminded of thier scathing description of Bishop Finn's episcopal ministry. With a few exceptions, I do not remember reading anything I disagreed with. What I did disagree with was thier interpretation of the meaning of many actions!
If a Tree Falls in a Forest...
But even I would be most surprised if anyone is still checking this page!
For those who are, I would like ot return to my perch to comment on the Motu Proprio,
some of the bizarre reactions to it, and the way I think it will impact parish life in general.
So, without further fanfare, here goes...


Tantum Ergo Sacramentum...
" Could you not watch one hour with me?"
